On-Prem

Networks

Deutsche Bahn stands to lose €400M if it has to do Huawei with Chinese kit

Telcos also due to get it in the neck unless the government pays up


Reliance on Chinese telecommunications equipment maker Huawei could end up costing Germany's state-owned rail operator Deutsche Bahn upwards of €400 million if a rip-and-replace order is issued.

According to internal documents obtained by German mag Der Spiegel, Deutsche Bahn, which has invested heavily in Chinese network equipment going back to 2015, faces delays in upgrade plans of five to six years should the Euro nation's government move forward with a ban on that kit. Up to 800 base stations would have to be replaced in Northern Germany alone, the document states.

The news comes just months after the rail operator awarded Deutsche Telekom - a telco that makes extensive use of Huawei equipment - a €64 million network modernization contract.

Chinese telecoms gear has been a source of controversy for years. The main concern being that, due to Chinese laws mandating the sharing of info with Beijing, Huawei could be forced to place backdoors in its equipment, allowing officials to spy on foreign nations. Huawei, for its part, has repeatedly denied these allegations, and said it abides by the law wherever it operates.

Germany is in a particularly precarious position, as the European Commission pushes for stiffer restrictions on the use of Chinese-sourced equipment in sensitive infrastructure. According to the Chinese embassy, Huawei accounts for nearly 60 percent of Germany's network equipment today.

Removing all this hardware would no doubt prove a costly endeavor, a fact highlighted by Germany's economy ministry in March. In a letter to a parliamentary economic committee, the ministry warned that ripping and replacing Huawei and ZTE equipment was likely to have a "significant impact on the operation of mobile networks and the fulfillment of coverage requirements."

And unlike the US, which reportedly received more than $5.6 billion in reimbursement requests from American ISPs and telecommunications providers, the way Germany's laws are written carriers could end up footing the bill to replace the equipment themselves.

Whether Europe's largest economy ultimately removes the Huawei equipment is still being discussed. As we've previously reported, the German government is still evaluating the security implications of the technology that powers its nation's networks and these findings could be crucial.

European countries have had the authority to restrict or prohibit high-risk suppliers ever since the so-called 5G Cybersecurity Toolbox was approved back in 2020. However, as European commissioner Thierry Breton recently lamented, few nations have put this authority into practice.

"We cannot afford to maintain critical dependencies that could become a weapon against our interests," he said in June, arguing that EU member nations' failure to bar and eliminate Chinese equipment from their 5G networks posed "a major security risk and exposes the Union's collective security since it creates a major dependency for the EU and serious vulnerabilities."

Pressure to strip Chinese gear from national networks has increased in recent years. Last October, the United Kingdom joined the US and ten EU countries in nixing Chinese equipment.

Despite pressure from American and European leaders, not all nations are keen on the idea. Huawei's success in the 5G arena has come in part thanks to lower prices, which has made their equipment more accessible compared to competing vendors.

This week, the South African ambassador to the BRICS bloc, Anil Sooklal, said the nation would not comply with US efforts to ban Chinese telecommunications equipment, Bloomberg reported

Brazil, another member of the BRICS bloc, has also previously rejected pressure from US leaders to eliminate Huawei equipment from its networks. ®

Send us news
39 Comments

Nvidia sees Huawei, Intel in rear mirror as it grapples with China ban

Commerce Sec threatens redesigned AI-capable chips will be curtailed 'the very next day'

How hard is your network really, comms watchdog asks telcos

Ofcom opens consultation on resilience requirements... power backup for mobile networks, anyone?

Government and the latest tech don't mix, says UK civil servant of £11B ESN mess

Public sector might want to 'wait a bit' before buying into bleeding edge, Sir Matthew Rycroft muses

US lawmakers want blanket denial for sensitive tech export licenses to China

Committee worries licenses are being issued to boost and suit business, not national security

Broadcom's latest Trident switch silicon packs neural net processor to terminate congestion

Chip promises better telemetry, security, and traffic engineering, vendor claims

What's the golden age of online services? Well, now doesn't suck

Yearning for the pre-web internet can be misplaced... it certainly wasn't user-friendly

Openreach hits halfway mark in quest to hook up 25M premises with fiber broadband

12.5 million teased with speedy internet, only 4 million take the bait

Ex-school IT admin binned student, staff accounts and trashed phone system

After getting the tintack, IRL BOFH went rogue

UK mulls next-gen satellite subsidies for Brit companies

Almost £100M in handouts available for LEO connectivity projects

Cisco's cloud network push will tie licensing change to generational product refreshes

Bundled support has already come to Catalyst – but don't bother asking how it works

Cisco delivers a powerup to its switches for small and medium biz

Catalyst 1200 and 1300 keep perpetual licenses, PoE and stackability

Activist Investor Elliott calls for a management reboot at Crown Castle

Urges US cell tower giant to reverse 'value-destructive strategy'